In summary,
See the following articles for a starting point to getting more info on this topic:
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2903694/network-management/sdn-management-battle-taps-vs-network-packet-brokers.html
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2291059/infrastructure-management/permanent-network-taps-for-complex-infrastructure.html
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2190430/infrastructure-management/network-packet-brokers-increase-visibility-and-performance.html
https://andyhuckridge.com/2012/02/12/maintaining-link-layer-visibility/
TAPs rely on network packet brokers for advanced features; network packet brokers rely on TAPs for bare metal.Also, NPBs supposedly enable link-layer visibility.
See the following articles for a starting point to getting more info on this topic:
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2903694/network-management/sdn-management-battle-taps-vs-network-packet-brokers.html
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2291059/infrastructure-management/permanent-network-taps-for-complex-infrastructure.html
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2190430/infrastructure-management/network-packet-brokers-increase-visibility-and-performance.html
https://andyhuckridge.com/2012/02/12/maintaining-link-layer-visibility/
No comments:
Post a Comment